Musings Report 2019-13 3-30-19 Are the Rise of Social Media and the Decline of Social Mobility Related?
You are receiving this email because you are one of the 500+ subscribers/major contributors to www.oftwominds.com.
For those who are new to the Musings reports: they are basically a glimpse into my notebook, the unfiltered swamp where I organize future themes, sort through the dozens of stories and links submitted by readers, refine my own research and start connecting dots which appear later in the blog or in my books. As always, I hope the Musings spark new appraisals and insights. Thank you for supporting the site and for inviting me into your circle of correspondents.
Welcome to March's MUS (Margins of the Unfiltered Swamp)
The last Musings of the month is a free-form exploration of the reaches of the fecund swamp that is the source of the blog, Musings and my books.
Thank You, Contributors!
Thank you, William P., Michael B. and Robert P. for renewing your generous support of my work, and welcome new subscribers-patrons Lawrence S. and Bob W.
Are the Rise of Social Media and the Decline of Social Mobility Related?
I've often addressed the decline of social mobility and the addictive nature of social media, and recently I've entertained the crazy notion that the two dynamics are related.
Why Is Social Media So Toxic?
I have long held that the decline of social mobility--broad-based opportunities to get ahead financially and socially--is part of a larger dynamic I call social depression: the social decay resulting from economic stagnation and the decline of social mobility and financial security.
America's Social Depression Is Accelerating
Japan offers a real-world 29-year lab experiment in the negative social consequences of economic stagnation, a topic I addressed back in 2010:
The Non-Financial Cost of Stagnation: "Social Recession" and Japan's "Lost Generations"
The conventional explanation of social media's addictive hold is that it activates the human brain's reward circuits much like an addictive drug: in effect, we become addicted to being "liked" and to checking our phones hundreds of times a day to see if we received any "news" or "likes".
This phenomenon is known as FOMO, fear of missing out: fear of missing out on some emotion-stimulating "news" or a "like" from someone in our network.
The innate addictive appeal of social media is pretty clear, but is that all that's at work here?
Being social animals, humans naturally seek to identify their status in the pecking order and improve their position by whatever means are available as a way of increasing their reproductive success and their relative share of resources.
Traditional societies were bifurcated into a small elite and a much larger mass of commoners. As a general rule, social mobility was limited to those extraordinary commoners who were especially valuable to the ruling elite as soldiers, scribes, etc.
From its inception in the early 1800s, the American Dream was to acquire the "good life" via mass produced luxury goods. This has been the mainstay of the modern consumer economy, a consumption-based economy that became dependent on credit in the 20th century.
The downside of mass-produced luxury items (status symbols) is that in a credit-based economy, just about everyone can afford to own them. Thus just about anyone can qualify for a mobile phone plan that offers a status-symbol iPhone as part of the multi-year contract.
As a result, the upper classes have been forced to greater extremes in cost and scarcity to differentiate themselves from the masses. For example, now that exotic travel is a affordable to anyone with credit, travel has little status value, unless it's extremely costly or difficult to duplicate.
The same is true of the arts and other cultural status markers, along with the traditional markers such as yachts and homes.
As the underlying economy has stagnated, access to the upper class via earned income has decayed, and so commoners have been forced to find some other non-financial means to improve their social status.
Social media fits the bill perfectly: it's essentially free (since everyone has to pay for Internet service anyway) and the only "investment" is in time: time snapping and posting photos on Instagram and Facebook, time posting comments and links designed to attract tribal "likes" and so on.
A commoner with essentially zero social status economically can with enough effort elevate their status or even become a "big shot" in some social media platform.
The bar is low enough to attract millions of players: a few dozen "likes" is still a potent reward for most people, as are having a couple hundred followers / readers.
Social media superstars with millions of followers on YouTube have cult-like groupies and all the other social status rewards of recognition and fame.
Social media offers hope of achieving higher online social status without having to succeed financially in a winner-take-most economy or having any of the conventional attributes of becoming famous: physical beauty, extraordinary talent, etc. These attributes are of course helpful in attracting a social media following, but they are not essential.
As a result, everyone wonders "how did so-and-so get hundreds of thousands of followers?" The answer varies, of course: a viral video, a high level of marketing moxie, an engaging style,a charismatic presence on camera, a knack for something others admire, etc.
If we understand social media as a new and accessible way to improve our unremarkable social status, its tremendous grip becomes less of a mystery.
Highlights of the Blog This Past Week
The "Miracle Cure": Walking 3/30/19
Apple's Rotten Core 3/28/19
Is the World Becoming Wealthier or Poorer? 3/27/19
When Are We Going to Tackle the For-Profit Monopolies Which Censored RussiaGate Skeptics? 3/26/19
From Left Field
The Autocrat’s New Tool Kit: The next generation of repressive technology will make past efforts to spread propaganda and quash dissent look primitive.
A Few Simple Steps to Vastly Increase Your Privacy Online (via Maoxian)
Bitcoin Is in the Dumps, Spreading Gloom Over Crypto World: The value of all cryptocurrencies outstanding is down 85% from peak and volumes on U.S. exchanges have been falling; making it through ‘winter’
Banking on the Cold War: The Cold War says more about how U.S. elites imagined their 'freedom' than it does about enabling other people to be free.
A Complete Psychological Analysis of Trump's Support: Science can help us make sense of the president's political invincibility.
The Servant Economy: Ten years after Uber inaugurated a new era for Silicon Valley, we checked back in on 105 on-demand businesses.
On Yellow Vests and Monsters
Nearly all Americans fail to eat enough of this actual superfood (via Maoxian) -- it's fiber, of course....
It Was All a Lie
Amoral and venal: Britain’s governing class has lost all sense of duty
Scholar makes ‘moral case’ for letting people decide their own age (via John F.) -- it seems everyone already indulges in this on online dating sites....
These charts reveal America's complicated relationship with exercise-- income matters....
"It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire
Thanks for reading--
charles |
|
