|
|
Musings Report 2025-32 8-9-25 I Apologize For Failing All Your Litmus Tests
You are receiving this email/post because you are a subscriber/patron of Of Two Minds / Charles Hugh Smith.
I Apologize For Failing All Your Litmus Tests
I want to apologize to everyone whose litmus tests I failed. As a non-partisan, non-ideological observer, I fail every tribe's litmus tests. I may appear to pass your first litmus test but in a few days I will fail your next litmus test, and arouse your rage, because it's all or nothing, right?
If you pass every litmus test, you're approved, if you fail even one, you're shunned.
If you pass them all, you're one of us, a member of our tribe, and welcomed into our echo chamber, where we all agree with one another and share our scorn for those in other tribes.
There is no middle ground left for those few of us who refuse to comply with the "choose a tribe" directive.
By refusing to join a tribe, we are dissenters in a conflict that no longer allows dissent.
This sliver of sandbar between the diverging rivers that's open to those who prefer to think things through for themselves--dissenters--is rapidly eroding.
Dissent isn't the problem. The system is broken, and that's the problem. There is no easy solution when a complex system is broken. In our frustration, confusion and anger, we seek a refuge, and a tribal echo chamber is a refuge of sorts.
Refusal to join the tribe--and that's what dissent means, refusing to join the tribe--is the problem to those who see only "us" (the good guys) and the heretics (to be burned at the stake), as if silencing dissenters is actually a solution to systemic breakdown.
That is the mindset of totalitarianism: if the system is no longer functioning as promised, then the solution isn't to admit this and seek practical ways to improve things. The solution is to silence those pointing out the system is broken, and especially those who refuse to join a tribe.
Here's how the litmus tests work. If you post a name, in any context, that's taken as approval of that individual and everything they stand for in a tribal sense. That's a fail--a big F-U, unsubscribe fail.
If you reference a media source that's viewed as "the other tribe's propaganda," that's a big fail, too.
I don't identify with any tribe, or any economic or political ideology. Yes, they hate me for my freedom.
I've been interrogated, long ago, for nonviolent resistance that was viewed as "crimes against the state." I was innocent, though complicit. What litmus test this passes or fails depends on the era and the tribe. It seems to have been a fail, then a pass and now, who knows.
I didn't do what I did to get anyone's approval, or to get a membership card in a tribe, I did what I thought was right. There is no tribe for that, as it's an individual calculus. ChatGPT can't make it for you. Nor can anyone else. The decision, activity and consequences are yours alone.
I gravitate to trades workers because I'm a trade worker--52 years and counting. We create value with our hands and the tacit knowledge that can only be gained from a deep well of experience. Tradespeople aren't a tribe; nobody is obligated to agree with anyone else. Rather, it's live and let live, because we're here to get the job done, not pass each other's litmus tests. What we value is integrity, doing what you said you were going to do, lending a hand, efficiency and good workmanship.
We joke around to get through the day and make light of the work. This is the opposite of being on the lookout for a chance to express outrage and indignation. What's the point of making everything harder by poisoning the jobsite with all that?
I confuse readers because they see something that's Libertarian in nature (decentralized, localized, self-reliance, trust your own network, not the corporation or the state, etc.), or Progressive (limiting the excesses of private equity) or Conservative (our entire system is rotten to the core due to moral decay) and then they'll find me quoting Marx approvingly ("All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned") and they're confused.
I'm not confused. Each of these tenets is supported by case studies and systems-level analysis. Kowtowing to a menu of ideological litmus tests offers no advantage other than entry into the echo-chamber, and those who prefer to think things through for themselves find echo chambers oppressive, the intellectual equivalent of Gulag Archipelago work camps where guards enforce compliance.
All the tribal ideologies have failed, like the system itself. The true believers have an explanation: there were impurities that spoiled the perfection of our ideological solution. Well, yes. Those impurities are called life.
Everyone's free to stay comfy and warm inside their echo chamber of choice, but solutions in a society where some consensus is required to actually solve anything rarely arise in echo chambers.
One reason for this is echo chambers are hermetically sealed. The litmus test beliefs are set in stone.
This is because those inside the echo chamber traded the uncertainties of skeptical inquiry for the certainties of a belief structure that they refuse to identify as a belief structure.
As for science--now just another arrow in the quiver of narrative control--science is skeptical inquiry, for science is not as incontrovertible as it is presented. Data is often ambiguous, protocols are often flawed, and statistical massaging can warp results to meet pre-selected goals. This is especially true of health sciences, which are attempting to quantify dynamic, highly interactive systems where isolating causal chains is contingent rather than absolute.
Is "the science" actually good science, or is it gamed, flawed or inconclusive? That's the hard part. It isn't scripture. It doesn't become true because we believe it. Then there's cui bono--to whose benefit? Billions of dollars in potential profits motivate all sorts of things, especially in a system in a freefall of moral decay.
The point here is certainty is easier than skeptical inquiry, but once we trade away inquiry for the certainties of belief, we lose the ability to adapt. Real solutions are no longer possible, because all we're allowed to propose are the same old approved tropes.
I'm not seeking approval. I'm seeking solutions.
Solutions aren't solutions because a tribe approves of them. They're solutions if they're tested in various conditions and found either lacking or promising, and the future consequences and second-order effects are considered closely.
So I fail all the litmus tests. Please accept my apologies.

Highlights of the Blog
What Would Happen If Sydney Sweeney Started Gardening and Baking Bread? 8/8/25
Resilient, Self-Reliant Life Is Hard 8/6/25
Two Ways to Fix Generational Wealth Inequality 8/4/25
Best Thing That Happened To Me This Week
I received this comment from a new subscriber, BCB:
"I support your work because you consistently write the best, most insightful and actionable commentary. I love your emphasis on self-reliance. I could not continue to read your free material without supporting the one generating it."
Thank you, BCB.
Another good thing was the baker in our household made simit, a much-treasured braided Turkish staple morning bread encrusted with sesame seeds or sunflower seeds.

It also makes a wonderful sandwich.

What's on the Book Shelf
The AI Mirror: How to Reclaim Our Humanity in an Age of Machine Thinking (Shannon Vallor)
From Left Field
NOTE TO NEW READERS: This list is not comprised of articles I agree with or that I judge to be correct or of the highest quality. It is representative of the content I find interesting as reflections of the current zeitgeist. The list is intended to be perused with an open, critical, occasionally amused mind.
Many links are behind paywalls. Most paywalled sites allow a few free articles per month if you register. It's the New Normal. At a reader's suggestion, I'm identifying links that are free/not paywalled.
The world’s most-visited museum shuts down with staff sounding the alarm on mass tourism (free) -- over-tourism...
Cost of Living in Japan 2025: Complete Guide & Real Expenses (free) -- you'll need this after you buy that abandoned house in the countryside for $100....
Princes of the Yen | The Hidden Power of Central Banks--Richard Werner (1:32 hours)(via djrichard)(free)
People Are Calling Out Modern Addictions Nobody Talks About, And Some Of These Hit Way Too Close To Home (free) -- no surprises here...
When Humans Learned to Live Everywhere: About 70,000 years ago in Africa, humans expanded into more extreme environments, a new study finds, setting the stage for our global migration. (NYT, paywalled)
99% of AI Startups Will Be Dead by 2026 — Here’s Why (free)
Real Risk to Youth Mental Health Is ‘Addictive Use,’ Not Screen Time Alone, Study Finds (NYT, paywalled)
AI Slop: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (29 min) (via Richard M.)(free)
A Woman Found a Suspicious Phone Buried on Her Lawn--thieves new surveillance tool...
The Secret to Building a $100 Million Mega-mansion (WSJ, paywalled) -- build your own private Versailles...
Hundreds of weight loss and diabetes jab users report pancreas problems (The Guardian, paywalled)
If the AI Bubble Pops, It Could Now Take the Entire Economy With It (free) (via Tom D.)
"The real problem of humanity is the following: We have Paleolithic emotions, medieval institutions, and godlike technology." E.O. Wilson (via Simon P.)
Thanks for reading--
charles
|
|
|
|
|
|