(May 20, 2010)
Correspondent Joe H. presents a model for investing in our own electrical
Instead of sending money every month to the local utility, what if you spent that
sum on solar panels? How much power would you be generating for your household?
How would you "spend" that electricity?
Readers often request more focus on solutions, as opposed to more doom-and-gloom
dissection of our current mire of corrupt crony capitalism dependent on cheap oil
and an exponential increase in debt.
Correspondent Joe H. offers us a question which leads directly to pondering solutions
which are in our own hands.
The vast majority of us send money to the local utility for electricity every month.
What if we invested that same sum in our own power generation? It's called
"owning the means of production" in a quasi-Marxist perspective, "self-sufficiency"
in another context, and "Yankee ingenuity"--a concept which has almost been lost
in our self-indulgent, entitlement culture which looks to sell-your-soul-to-the-Devil
"financial innovations" as the "solution" to our problems.
Here is Joe's commentary:
Starting point: Re-read
The Art of Survival, Taoism and the Warring States (June 27, 2008):
I have often found it valuable to attack problems from "the other direction."
If I cannot pull a gear off a shaft, can I drive the shaft out of the gear?
If I cannot develop a plan to resource a my project, can I reconfigure the
project to fit the resources? If I get mentally stuck trying to reconfigure the
project to fit the resources, then can I zero-base the project to fit under
It is depressing to anticipate the path we would likely take from here. One
common topic is Peak Oil so let's stand that problem on it's head and see if
knowing becomes less of a burden. To keep the exercise manageable, let's play
with home based solar systems using the zero-based approach.
What activities can 10 Watts perform? What activity(s) would most people choose?
The answer seems pretty clear: Cell-phones and other wireless, mobile technologies.
Need entertainment? It is in your hand. Need a weather report? Ditto.
Need to tell your spouse to pick up milk at the store? Done. Need to perform
some simple math calculations? Piece of cake.
Second choice: Some LED lighting applications if there is extra capacity.
The next step up is a big one.
There is a historical precedence that the cost of one's tools should not exceed
one year's wages that you could earn with those tools. One explanation for the
basis of this rule-of-thumb was that apprentices were expected to spend 25% of
their 4 year apprenticeship making their own tools. An apprentice blacksmith
would start with the very simplest tools (a hammer, perhaps) and toward the end
of his apprenticeship would be making intricate tongs and heat-treated chisels.
Using this rule-of-thumb, how much capacity would one year's electric bill buy,
and what would you dedicate that capacity toward?
I learned that mindless Watt-for-Watt replacement will cost me approximately 13
years worth of electric bills. That suggests that the cost of one year's electric
bills would supply approximately 1/20th of my current usage! If my math is correct,
that works out to 200 Watts during the daylight hours or 100 Watts over 24 hours.
Cell phones, lap-top, LED lights, sump-pump (emergency), water pump (intermittent),
and a ceiling fan (summer) are about all I could probably manage. The furnace is
gone because it has a huge blower motor and winter, in Michigan, has terrible solar
availability. Wood-stove is the way to go.
Good-bye electric hotwater heater. Good-bye electric clothes drier.
Aside: The greatest blow an individual American family can strike against terrorism
is to buy 100 feet of clothes line, 200 clothes pins and to use them! Huge benefit
would accrue even if we just hung out the big, heavy stuff like jeans, towels,
sweat-shirts, sheets, blankets.
So this is where I invite your readership to participate. How would you budget
100 Watts over 24 hours to maximize your life's utility and enjoyment?
Thank you, Joe, for a thought-provoking question.
Just as a larger context for the question, here is a chart depicting the intersection
of four great macro-trends:
In responding to Joe's question, I would immediately grant that as he mentions, northern
states might not receive enough bright sun annually to justify a solar array on
strictly financial terms.
But as I argue in Survival+, there is value in control of assets and production
which is not easily quantified. Even if a solar array only generates power during
the summer months, it is within your control. That's valuable.
Or the investment in "tools" Joe describes could be made in other technologies
more suitable for cold climes, such as geoexchange heating. The Earth is about
50-55 degrees F. some feet down; drill a deep narrow shaft, run a pipe down and
use the Earth's latent heat to warm water to 50 F. The water then need be heated only
10-15 F to warm the house to a comfortable ambient temperature.
Reverse the process in hot summers. Water at 50 F will cool a house quite well.
Yes, you need a small pump to circulate the water. Hmm, how about 100 watts?
Add in some (comparatively cheap) insulation and glazing films and the 50% of the nation's energy
consumed heating and cooling buildings drops considerably--at least in your house.
Solutions abound, both at the macro and household level. Are they easy or cheap? No.
But that's not the same as saying they don't exist.
If you haven't visited the forum, here's a place to start. Click on the link
below and then select "new posts." You'll get to see what other oftwominds.com readers and
contributors are discussing/sharing.
is now open for aggregating our collective intelligence.
Order Survival+: Structuring Prosperity for Yourself and the Nation and/or
Survival+ The Primer
from your local bookseller or from amazon.com or in ebook
A 20% discount is available from the publisher.
Of Two Minds is now available via Kindle:
Of Two Minds blog-Kindle
"This guy is THE leading visionary on reality.
He routinely discusses things which no one else has talked about, yet,
turn out to be quite relevant months later."
--Walt Howard, commenting about CHS on another blog.
NOTE: contributions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email
remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.
Thank you, Derek L. ($45), for your exceptionally generous contribution
to the site--it is an honor to be supported by an active-duty member of the
U.S. Armed Forces.
I am greatly honored by your support and readership.
Thank you, Wayne L. ($5), for your very generous donation
to the site. (Every donation is extremely consequential.)
I am greatly honored by your support and readership.
Or send him coins, stamps or quatloos via mail--please
request P.O. Box address.
Your readership is greatly appreciated with or without a donation.
For more on this subject and a wide array of other topics, please visit
All content, HTML coding, format design, design elements and images copyright ©
2010 Charles Hugh Smith, All rights
reserved in all media, unless otherwise credited or noted.
I would be honored if you linked this wEssay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use.