(March 9, 2011)
Public employees and their leaders could publicly recognize the structural and demographic
changes in the U.S. economy, and vow to tax the top 1% instead of supporting
terribly regressive junk fees and sales tax increases on the working poor and
the middle class tax donkeys who pay most of the taxes. The fact that they refuse
to acknowledge these realities and refuse to take on the Financial Elites
Here's what representatives of public-sector unions and public employees
could be saying, instead of what they are saying:
There are over 20 million Federal, state and local government employees, and
about 106 million private sector workers. We work for you, and for the good
of our communities and of the nation. That is a big responsibility.
Back in the stock market bubble of 1995 to 1999, our wages, pensions and benefits
were "sweetened," sometimes administratively and sometimes with voter approval.
In the years since, what looked at the time like it would be paid by stock market
gains rather than additional taxes has been revealed as wishful thinking.
We recognize that the U.S. economy has changed structurally, and it cannot return
to 1999. We also recognize that the demographics of the nation have irrevocably
changed since 1999, and thus it is wrong to burden future workers with pension and benefit
costs which only made sense in an era of stock prices rising 10% or more annually.
In response to the shortfall between what we were granted in 1995-1999 and what the
"new normal" recessionary economy can support, state and local governments have aggressively
raised the most terribly regressive taxes: junk fees--parking tickets, vehicle
license fees, and so on--and sales taxes.
These taxes are paid by everyone, rich and poor alike, and so they are deeply
Most of the Federal and state income taxes are paid by upper-middle class
workers and small business, including sole proprietors and independent contractors.
Almost 40% of all workers--those with lower incomes--pay no income tax at all. The
top 1%, meanwhile, pay on average about 17% of their income in total taxes--less than
half the rate paid by upper-middle class wage earners.
We understand that roughly two-thirds of the nation's households are measurably
poorer in income and assets than they were a few short years ago. We understand
that gains in productivity have not flowed to the incomes of most private-sector
workers, but have instead flowed to the top via corporate profits and bonuses to
the top slice of private-sector employees.
We also understand that the American workforce is aging, and that demographics
are dictating that we as a nation need to work longer if our retirement plans
are to remain solvent.
In recognition of these realities, we in the public sector are voluntarily renouncing
all the "sweeteners" which were awarded during the bubble years of 1995-1999, as
they have been revealed as unaffordable. Our retirement and benefits will revert
to the base year of 1995, before the bubble distorted the system and the economy,
and be adjusted for inflation since then as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
In recognition of the nation's demographic realities, we are moving our retirement
age up to those of the Social Security system: 62 for reduced benefits and 67 for
full retirement benefits.
We understand that raising "stealth taxes" via junk fees and
highly regressive sales taxes places great burdens on households which are already
straining to make ends meet.
As a result, we are putting our political weight behind an alternative way to
bolster state and local government finances: "make the top 1% pay the same tax rate
as the rest of us." If the top 1% paid the same 40% rate as higher-income workers
pay, then that would only be equitable.
We will also fight to reverse the regressive increases in sales taxes and junk fees
which have been imposed on those least able to afford more taxes.
The super-wealthy--those households with incomes above $1 million annually, and
with financial assets above $5 million-- are the most politically powerful group
in the nation, and so getting them to pay the same tax rates as we pay will be
a difficult battle. They own or control the political class, the tax attorneys,
the tax-avoidance scams and the offshore accounts.
But taking more money from households who are struggling to get by with highly
regressive taxes and junk fees is simply wrong, just as it is unjust that the
super-wealthy avoid paying the same tax rates that ordinary workers pay.
We ask for your support in this campaign to reverse regressive taxes and
make the top 1% pay the same tax rate as the rest of us.
What is not being said is this: public employees are dependent on, and benefit from,
the State's monopoly to collect taxes and fees via coercion.
Private-sector workers cannot rely on a coercive monopoly to extract their wages
from others. This is the key difference between the public and private sectors.
To the degree that junk fees and taxes have been raised administratively by a
political class that is beholden to the super-wealthy Financial Elites and
cartel-State fiefdoms, then the imposition of regressive junk fees and other taxes
is taxation without representation, i.e. tyranny.
Public employees benefit from this tyranny, private-sector workers do not. That is
a key difference between the two.
Given that the political class only represents cartel-State fiefdoms and Financial
Elites, then the only taxes which aren't a form of tyranny are those
approved by voters.
While there is always a danger of "the tyranny of the majority" in the ballot box,
it is certainly less tyrannical than administratively imposing regressive taxes
and exorbitant junk fees on the working poor and the middle class tax donkeys.
The consent of the governed (and thus of the taxed) can be revoked at any time.
If you would like to post a comment, please go to
Order Survival+: Structuring Prosperity for Yourself and the Nation
(Mobi ebook) (Kindle) or
Survival+ The Primer
or Weblogs & New Media: Marketing in Crisis
(Kindle) or from your local bookseller.
Of Two Minds is also available via Kindle:
Of Two Minds blog-Kindle
"This guy is THE leading visionary on reality.
He routinely discusses things which no one else has talked about, yet,
turn out to be quite relevant months later."
--Walt Howard, commenting about CHS on another blog.
NOTE: contributions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email
remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.
Thank you, Brian L. ($50), for your exceedingly generous contribution
to this site --
I am greatly honored by your support and readership.
Thank you, Hans S. ($10), for your much-appreciated generous contribution
to this site --
I am greatly honored by your support and readership.
Or send him coins, stamps or quatloos via mail--please
request P.O. Box address.
Subscribers ($5/mo) and contributors of $50 or more
this year will receive a
weekly email of exclusive (though not necessarily coherent) musings and amusings,
and an offer of a small token of my appreciation:
a signed copy of
a novel or
Survival+ (either work admirably as doorstops).
At readers' request, there is also a $10/month option.
The "unsubscribe" link is for when you find the usual drivel here
Your readership is greatly appreciated with or without a donation.
For more on this subject and a wide array of other topics, please visit
All content, HTML coding, format design, design elements and images copyright ©
2011 Charles Hugh Smith, All rights
reserved in all media, unless otherwise credited or noted.
I would be honored if you linked this essay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use.