The 800-Pound Gorilla Crushing "Healthcare": Malpractice
(August 6, 2009)
I have characterized the American legal system as an induced state of destructively profitable mental illness. Malpractice is a perfect example of this fundamental nature.
The entire U.S. legal system is a form of induced mental illness, an insane asylum in which simulacra of "justice" mask the most blatant chicanery, fraud and injustice. To see this clearly, it is instructive to compare the way medical malpractice is handled in Canada and the U.S. For that, we turn once again to frequent contributor "Ishabaka" M.D. who has practiced medicine in both the U.S. and Canada.
But first let's look at a conventional comparison of the two healthcare systems: A Canadian doctor diagnoses U.S. healthcare (L.A. Times)
On costs, Canada spends 10% of its economy on healthcare; the U.S. spends 16%. The extra 6% of GDP amounts to more than $800 billion per year. The spending gap between the two nations is almost entirely because of higher overhead. Canadians don't need thousands of actuaries to set premiums or thousands of lawyers to deny care. Even the U.S. Medicare program has 80% to 90% lower administrative costs than private Medicare Advantage policies. And providers and suppliers can't charge as much when they have to deal with a single payer.
Yes, it's obvious to all that the U.S. system carries an extremely high overhead of paperwork churn. But it's simply wrong to consider Medicare a low-cost edifice--studies have suggested about 50% of Medicare costs are waste/fraud/needless.
The conventional MSM critique of the U.S. system mentions malpractice as a side issue or as item 10 on a long list of problems. But malpractice and the sick U.S. legal system are central to healthcare's coming implosion. Let's turn to one of our correspondents in the front lines of the healthcare field:
Here's an interesting fact for you: in Canada, lawyers are not allowed to take contingency fees - you get disbarred if you do. Consequently, when I practiced there in back in 1978 - 1981, malpractice insurance was $200 a year for ALL specialities, including the highest risk ones. Every year, the (single, run by doctors) insurance company would publish the details of every settled claim, and any doctor who read them would go "Man! - That's really malpractice!".
Can anyone read this account (and hundreds more along the same lines) and conclude "the U.S. has the finest healthcare system in the world"? More like the worst in the developed world, and a system made infinitely worse by the induced state of destructively profitable mental illness known as the U.S. legal system.
Let's list what our wondrous malpractice system creates on its very own, with no help from the other ills of the system:
1. "Defensive medicine" in which doctors and other caregivers administer worthless/needless tests and medications by the boatload lest they be dragged into court for not following every item of a cookie-cutter protocol--and since the tests and drugs are "free" to those with gold-plated insurance and to recipients of Medicare and Medicaid, there is literally no possible reason not to over-test and over-medicate and every incentive to do so.
At a friend's dinner party we met a young medical student visiting the U.S. from Europe for postgraduate studies as U.C.S.F., one of the finest medicial teaching universities in the world. He told us the procedure doctor are told to follow is simple: patient has high blood pressure, prescribe these three medications; patient is at risk of heart disease, these three medications, and so on. Meanwhile, he observed that no one knows how these 6, 9, 12, 15 or 20 medications interact within the patient.
In other words, the pressure from malpractice is all about following protocols as "defensive medicine," even if the results are unhelpful or even dangerous for the patient. If you follow the established protocols then you have constructed a legal defense: and in our sick, deranged system, that has become as important and pressing as caring for patients.
2. Randomized "justice." The U.S. system guarantees that true malpractice can be dodged (just move to another state) while "bad outcome" suits can win millions for drunks who climb into tiger cages or wreck their cars, etc. Is a lottery wheel actually a form of "justice"? Only if you're insane--and the U.S. legal system is clinically insane.
3. Doctors are pressured to avoid the seriously ill because the "outcome" has a higher probability of being "bad" and hence the probabilities of being sued are higher. So in this insane asylum of a system we call "the finest healthcare system in the world," caregivers are punished for attempting to aid those who are gravely ill.
4. It is safer, less worrisome and more profitable to stop practicing medicine and start pushing paper or buy some testing machines.
5. Lawyers have huge incentives to take cases on contingency: that is, if you hit the jackpot (the lottery form of "justice" again) then you win up to 30% of the jackpot (some states have limited the take and amazingly enough, these states aren't facing shortages of doctors like states with freewheeling malpractice roulette wheel "justice".)
The truly pernicious part of the malpractice madness is that it drives up costs in largely hidden ways. Nobody gets a bill which compares the cost of what treatment would have been in a system free from "defensive medicine" designed to create legal defenses against "bad outcome" malpractice lawsuits.
Ironically, this deranged system of malpractice does nothing to weed out those caregivers who are actually practicing poor medicine and harming patients. Rigorous national regulation is what's needed, not more roulette-wheel-"justice" lawsuits.
Readers contributed a number of cogent healthcare-related links and ideas. Correspondent Rod C. recommended this article from the www.thepeoplesvoice.org:
The only way any sanity and humanity may be restored to this situation is for individuals to take control of their own destiny by regaining control of their own healthcare dollars. The tax free Healthcare Savings Accounts (HSAs) established during the Bush administration are a step in the right direction. But these should be more strongly supported by allowing contributions to HSAs tax credit status instead of mere tax deduction status.
I am, in fact, a "cash only" purchaser of healthcare, and sure enough, my doctor works with me and charges me substantially less for services than he charges patients who have insurance.
Frequent contributor Cheryl A. submitted this telling article on the powerful forces working to maintain the status quo at all costs, and the few lonely voices speaking the truth about the coming collapse of the status quo:
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-OK, filibustered against the measure for one hour and 20 minutes. “By the way, if you are a federal employee and unhappy with me trying to defeat this amendment, you should pay attention to something. There is no guarantee to your federal pension based on the economics we face today in this country. If you think it is guaranteed, you have another thought coming because the world economic system is going to determine whether we can honor that pension. That is what is coming. We are very close,” Coburn said.
I think the greatest scam going is the AMA, with its "prestigious profession," the gilt-edged life style and the aura of God that doctors so readily assume. Yet it is at bottom a trade, no different than being a plumber or a carpenter. Any reasonably bright kid coming out of high school could enter a technical school and emerge in two or three years at least as competent as most doctors. As to surgeons, that's just a more advanced skill set. As anyone who's been around doctors and hospitals a reasonable amount of time will surely tell you, it is the experienced RNs who do the yeoman's work with patients, with less error than the MDs generally. This has been done for eons in the US military, with corpsment and Special Operations personnel, who are rapidly and very effectively trained to do what doctors do, and to do it under the most stressful situations. This training includes surgery.
There is a simple way to solve the Health care problem using a combination of free market and governmental policies.
TheStreet.com columnist John Lounsbury picked up on my entry The "Impossible" Healthcare Solution: Go Back to Cash (July 29, 2009) and wrote an isightful outline of a practical healthcare reform: Patient Needs Larger Role in Health Care.
The good folks at whiskeyandgunpowder.com were kind enough to post that entry and send it out to their extensive email list.
Thank you, readers, Mr. Lounsbury and whiskeyandgunpowder.com for your promotion of real reform of a doomed, insane system.
How doomed is it? I have covered this topic many times--please read these previous entries for full statistics and links to further data:
Social Welfare, Socialism and Healthcare (May 19, 2009)
Yes, There Will Be Armageddon: Government Goes Bankrupt (July 24, 2008)
Recipe for National Insolvency (June 9, 2008)
The End of Entitlements (July 27, 2007)
"Your book is truly a revolutionary act." Kenneth R.
"This guy is THE leading visionary on reality.
He routinely discusses things which no one else has talked about, yet,
turn out to be quite relevant months later."
NOTE: contributions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.
Or send him coins, stamps or quatloos via mail--please request P.O. Box address.
Your readership is greatly appreciated with or without a donation.
For more on this subject and a wide array of other topics, please visit
All content, HTML coding, format design, design elements and images copyright © 2009 Charles Hugh Smith, All rights reserved in all media, unless otherwise credited or noted.
I would be honored if you linked this wEssay to your site, or printed a copy for your own use.
|consulting||blog fiction/novels articles my hidden history books/films what's for dinner||home email me|